Care team
2 in the teamWho needs to be involved, and why
Every participant carries a reason and the record entry behind it, so the list can be checked rather than trusted. Colleagues other than the signed-in clinician are simulated for this demonstration.
- Dr Maya Shah
Usual GP · Riverside Practice
Registered GP; holds the record.
EvidenceRegistered GP on the patient record
- Priya Ramansimulated
Heart failure specialist nurse · Northbank General
Heart failure indicator present in the record.
EvidenceHeart failure on the problem list, active, recorded 14 Feb 2026 (SIM-PROBLEM-3). NYHA class is not recorded in this record source.
Suggested by the record review
2 suggestedA read-only reading of the whole record, checked by a second pass. Each suggestion carries its reason and the record entries behind it. Nobody joins the team unless you add them.
- Usual GP or responsible primary-care clinicianCore to the meetingalready on the team
Confirm the current clinical picture, reconcile records and medicines, assess readiness and capacity, invite the patient using the recorded preference, and own documentation and follow-up.
The available longitudinal record, active-problem list, symptom encounters, and monitoring are GP-owned, making primary care the clearest documented coordinator.
- Eligible
The longitudinal EHR record and relevant hypertension and neurological encounters are owned by GP; telephone is the recorded contact preference.
- Clinician responsible for the urgent neurological assessmentCore to the meeting
Provide the assessment outcome, likely reversibility, treatment options, and near-term clinical uncertainties before or at the planning discussion.
New language difficulty and drowsiness were judged to need urgent rather than routine assessment, but no outcome is available in the snapshot.
- Eligible19 Aug 2026
GP encounter documents two word-finding episodes, increasing drowsiness, and advice for urgent assessment.
Add a participant
Personal details
Auto-filled from the patient record. SIM-000304
What matters to the patient
Their words come first. Set in the voice face, quoted, never paraphrased.
Capacity for this decision
requiredWhether the person had capacity for this decision when it was made.
Patient's expressed wishes
requiredIn their own words, from the conversation.
Patient's expressed fears and concerns
What they are worried about, in their words.
What is most important to the patient about how they are treated
requiredWhere their priority sits between comfort and life-sustaining treatment.
Clinical context
The picture a colleague needs before reading the recommendations.
Diagnosis summary
requiredThe relevant conditions and recent events, as recorded.
Likely clinical trajectory
How things have been changing for this person, from the record.
Relevant active medications
Medicines that matter in an emergency, as the record lists them.
Recommendations for emergency care
Recommendations, not legally binding. Clinical judgement applies. This is not a DNACPR form.
CPR recommendation
requiredA clinical recommendation agreed with the person; not legally binding and not a DNACPR form.
Rationale
Why, and who it was discussed with.
Escalation ceiling
requiredThe level of treatment the team recommends if the person becomes unwell.
Rationale
Why this ceiling, in a sentence a colleague can check.
Clinical priorities if the patient deteriorates
requiredWhat should happen first, and who should be involved.
Signatures and review
0 of 7 required fields recorded.
Still needed: Capacity for this decision, Patient's expressed wishes, What is most important to the patient about how they are treated, Diagnosis summary, CPR recommendation, Escalation ceiling, Clinical priorities if the patient deteriorates.